correct the content before adding it into Runescape from Skyzhay's blog
I don't believe the player RS 2007 Gold base is good at determining which content, based on merit, is great for integrity and the overall health of Runescape long-term. We see people vote based on self interest. According to polling, the neighborhood liked NMZ but it was important to remove. Players do not vote for any changes that make things tougher for them but over time that becomes a drawback as material becomes simpler and achievements are diluted, these can very slight but easily add up.
Another example is PvP and PK changes that are voted against. People even voted against allowing pures wear chaps, despite having the ability to wear the variations. Improve profits and therefore the only effect of the to accounts that were normal would have been to slightly increase the need. This isn't an example of polling fulfilling the interests of Runescape, it's just a meme of not enjoying pures. If we only see updates which match the exact same 75% of people every time the remaining 25% become increasingly marginalised, which isn't a good balance when those 75/25 are seemingly so often the same individuals.
Not everyone will make sound decisions while voting, or create the"right" alternative. If literally everyone made the most educated, most educated objective voting choices. The United States wouldn't have. Nothing longer, real world example of unemployment. Our voting system isn't ideal, but we all have to make sure we don't wind up with the garbage that has pushed down RS3 players. Our throats. There are definitely improves that could be made that don't undermine it though (which are not being achieved or tried ).
What will kill and destroy this game and its integrity is the voting system's continuous disregard that jagex has been doing lately and is trying to push more of, as evident with this survey. If jagex appeared as much as they say they do about it, then they would not have unclear and confusing wording in polls. Its a thing that is consistent too. You'd think it would get evidence read or something. Not even bare minimum effort.
I'm not advocating to dismiss or abolish the polling system and it's a instrument in holding the devs into account. On the flip side, the polling system does not function effectively and necessitates flexibility or improvements to meet the requirements of their participant base. I can not agree with the exaggeration on your article about the disregard of items that are polled when 99 percent of content is left to pick. It is important to be aware that the events when they have been believed by Jagex had to diverge in the polled outcome, it was because they felt forced to by the issues together with the voting system.
The VLS addition is a Buy RuneScape 2007 Gold recent and obvious example of the: Jagex poll several PvP changes/updates which don't pass and don't believe the neighborhood are fairly evaluating the material on objective merit. This means Jagex possibly take that PvP buffs/content won't ever pass polls or do them anyway. Polls either need to be a) pitched to individuals who actively participate in or understand that the relevant content( b) taken as strong advisement and not gospel( c) lower threshold, or d) simply earn more integrity changes.
Another example is PvP and PK changes that are voted against. People even voted against allowing pures wear chaps, despite having the ability to wear the variations. Improve profits and therefore the only effect of the to accounts that were normal would have been to slightly increase the need. This isn't an example of polling fulfilling the interests of Runescape, it's just a meme of not enjoying pures. If we only see updates which match the exact same 75% of people every time the remaining 25% become increasingly marginalised, which isn't a good balance when those 75/25 are seemingly so often the same individuals.
Not everyone will make sound decisions while voting, or create the"right" alternative. If literally everyone made the most educated, most educated objective voting choices. The United States wouldn't have. Nothing longer, real world example of unemployment. Our voting system isn't ideal, but we all have to make sure we don't wind up with the garbage that has pushed down RS3 players. Our throats. There are definitely improves that could be made that don't undermine it though (which are not being achieved or tried ).
What will kill and destroy this game and its integrity is the voting system's continuous disregard that jagex has been doing lately and is trying to push more of, as evident with this survey. If jagex appeared as much as they say they do about it, then they would not have unclear and confusing wording in polls. Its a thing that is consistent too. You'd think it would get evidence read or something. Not even bare minimum effort.
I'm not advocating to dismiss or abolish the polling system and it's a instrument in holding the devs into account. On the flip side, the polling system does not function effectively and necessitates flexibility or improvements to meet the requirements of their participant base. I can not agree with the exaggeration on your article about the disregard of items that are polled when 99 percent of content is left to pick. It is important to be aware that the events when they have been believed by Jagex had to diverge in the polled outcome, it was because they felt forced to by the issues together with the voting system.
The VLS addition is a Buy RuneScape 2007 Gold recent and obvious example of the: Jagex poll several PvP changes/updates which don't pass and don't believe the neighborhood are fairly evaluating the material on objective merit. This means Jagex possibly take that PvP buffs/content won't ever pass polls or do them anyway. Polls either need to be a) pitched to individuals who actively participate in or understand that the relevant content( b) taken as strong advisement and not gospel( c) lower threshold, or d) simply earn more integrity changes.
The Wall